Mortimer J. Adler describes the opportunity of studying the Great Books
of the Western World:
"Suppose there were a college or university in
which the faculty was thus composed: Herodotus
and Thucydides
taught the history of Greece, and Gibbon
lectured on the fall of Rome. Plato
and St.
Thomas gave a course in metaphysics together; Francis
Bacon and John
Stuart Mill discussed the logic of science; Aristotle,
Spinoza,
and Immanuel
Kant shared the platform on moral problems; Machiavelli,
Thomas
Hobbes, and John
Locke talked about politics.
"You could take a series of courses in mathematics
from Euclid,
Descartes,
Riemann, and Cantor, with Bertrand
Russell and A.N.
Whitehead added at the end. You could listen to St.
Augustine, Aquinas
and William
James talk about the nature of man and the human mind,
with perhaps Jacques Maritain to comment on the lectures.
"In economics, the lectures were by Adam
Smith, Ricardo, Karl
Marx, and Marshall. Boas discussed the human race and
its races, Thorstein
Veblen and John
Dewey the economic and political problems of American
democracy, and Lenin lectured on communism.
"There might even be lectures on art by Leonardo da
Vinci, and a lecture on Leonardo by Freud.
A much larger faculty than this is imaginable, but this
will suffice.
"Would anyone want to go to any other university,
if he could get into this one? There need be no limitation
of numbers. The price of admission -- the only entrance
requirement -- is the ability and willingness to read and
discuss. This school exists for everybody who is willing
and able to learn from first-rate teachers."
("Only Adults Can Be Educated", interview of
Mortimer J. Adler with Max Weismann, in "Philosophy is
Everybody's Business: Journal of the Center for the Study
of The Great Ideas", Vol 3, No 1, 1996.)
The Great
Books of the Western World were compiled by Mortimer
Adler working with a staff, and published by Encyclopedia
Britannica in 1952, then revised 1990.
Mortimer Adler, in his book
"A Second Look in the Rearview Mirror", has
talked about the difficulty of selecting "great
books" for a collection. It is a particularly
difficult problem with recent works, until we have some
perspective.
Adler notes that the criterion for
selection of a great book is not its "truth".
Among these works are to be found opinions, backed up by
careful reasoning or illustrations from life, on at least
two sides of every one of the great questions. This is not
to say that all views are equally correct, or that which
views you adopt is of no consequence. Quite the contrary.
But, you may only benefit by learning from mankind's
greatest minds and, by contrasting and thinking for
yourself, accepting the challenge to reconcile their
reasonings with your own views.
What are the criteria for
selecting great books? Adler lists three criteria:
- the book has contemporary
significance; that is, relevance to the problems and
issues of our times;
- the book is inexhaustible; it
can be read again and again with benefit; and
- the book is relevant to a large
number of the great ideas and great issues that have
occupied the minds of thinking individuals for the last
25 centuries. (Adler, "Second Look", pg
142; source)
See also Adler's
additional comments on the process of selecting works
for the 1990 edition of GBWW.
Adler writes: "The
difference between great
and good books is one of kind, not of degree. Good
books are not "almost great" or "less than
great" books. Great books are relevant to human
problems in every century, not just germane to current
twentieth-century problems. A great book requires to be
read over and over, and has many meanings; a good book
needs to have no more than one meaning, and it need be read
no more than once."