"Q&A: Buying a used set of Great Books of the Western World?"
The second edition differed from the first in many respects: new translations, a revised Syntopicon, and six volumes of twentieth-century authors that did not appear in the first edition, as well as fifteen authors added in the period from Homer to Freud. More info.
Q. Which authors are added to the 1990 edition?
A.
Q. >Are the older sets more durable (paper, binding)?
What year did the syntopicon change? (So far, I prefer the older
version with more detail).<
A. There's no perceivable difference to the layman in the binding
of the older and newer set. The newer set has thinner paper,
which makes for somewhat slimmer volumes. But as far as
durability is concerned, for normal reading I don't think the
thinner paper is inferior in any way; if you're going to be
using the books to practice juggling, the slightly thicker paper
may last longer, but not much.
Q. >Is there any intrinsic value to owning a first edition in great
shape?<
A. If there is any, it most likely depends upon the individual
preferences. A couple of authors (Appolonius of Perga, Fielding,
Sterne) from the 1952 set were dropped from the 1990 edition.
But of course the 1990 edition added several authors.
Q. >Any major problems with not having the updated syntopicon?<
A. I recommend you buy the Syntopicon that goes with your set; in
other words, a 1952 Syntopicon should go with the 1952 edition,
and a 1990 Syntopicon should go with the 1990 edition. That
should be no problem at all if you're buying a complete set,
which includes the Syntopicon in the first place. As far as I
know, the essays and references in the new 1990 Syntopicon are
revised to reflect the new authors added to (and the old ones
dropped from) the 1990 GBWW; the 1990 Syntopicon also contains
works as recent as the late 1980s in its bibliography of
additional readings related to the Great Ideas.
Having a 1952 set and not having the updated 1990 Syntopicon is
not a big drawback at all, especially when you're just starting
out in reading the Great Books. The only kind of reason I could
imagine why it would be a major drawback is if you've already
read and studied all the books in the 1952 set with the help of
the Syntopicon, and you want to continue to use the Syntopicon
in your reading and study in the new works (mostly 20th century
works) that were added to the 1990 set. Otherwise, you can just
as well go to a library and consult a recent Syntopicon if you
don't have one. The main difference between the 1952 and 1990 editions
are the addition of the 6 volumes containing 20th century
authors. Posted by Zaheer Samee